"If you do not live to serve, not serve to live"
is the theme of blogging Julio Carmona
( edited with the collaboration of John Victor Alfaro):
http://www.vosquedepalabrasvives.blogspot.com/
http://www.mesterdeobreria.blogspot.com/
 |
| With those eyes of wonder trespassed with his father and gestures debris that must never be forgotten: NO. |
1. The then First Lady of the Nation, 1994-2000, Keiko Fujimori Higuchi, now presidential candidate, was absolutely impossible to know whether prosecuted for drug trafficking and Ana Isabel MARTINEZ MORENO MORENO MARTINEZ Mariana Jack, at 40 days of judicial custody, those processed in a criminal court of Lima, were innocent or guilty. It was not the police, prosecutor or judge in the case, nor had a parallel investigation to the court. Even the media had dealt them.
The honorary position which held, replacing his mother's unusual Susana Higuchi, shackled at the Government Palace, did not concern him formally investigate anything or anybody, drug trafficking, nor make inquiries under the table in the lee of immorality and the prebend present or future. However, he says he spoke with Cipriani, Jose Ugaz, Rafael Rey and the devil Montesinos, who were not passing it to their favored processed. Never talked to police that made the police report, nor the prosecutor who filed the criminal complaint, either with the judge who opened the process and ordered the arrest of the known daughters of Eudocio Martinez, "Olluquito", another of the co-defendants for the same serious crime.
All efforts were made behind the scenes, in the assurance of his father, who got the same trial judge released both processed after 1 March 2000, the day he was initialed, signed and sealed Supreme Resolution No. 044-2000-JUS of Alberto Fujimori and the late Justice Minister Alberto Bustamante Belaunde, which grants the right of pardon. This rule requires that the trial judge declared extinct criminal action (short and archive processing actuated) and order the immediate release, which was fulfilled to the letter. Almost no judge dared to disobey the executive order, even if it was illegal.
2. Clear and self-confessed criminal proceeding as Keiko .- Whoever produces a similar behavior as it does on an offense, more so if after receiving 10,000 dollars as a donation from the criminally released. The bribe the manager may be before, during or after the fait accompli.
Not being a lawyer, police, prosecutor or judge of the case, but only First Lady's Office does not have access to the details of the process its parts, process and various measures of which it consists. How, then, knowing they were innocent or that they were being extorted by someone? Is that the word interest of Cardinal Juan Luis Cipriani, Rafael Rey Rey and attorney Jose Ugaz price replaces the criminal record of the process itself? Ideal Contest
Torts .- The behavior confessed KEIKO, ontic-ontological view, outline a complex set of offenses in undisputed Contest Ideal, Real Competition of different criminal activities. At that, the same conduct violates several rules while criminal proceedings (Art. 48 °, Penal Code), in this, it is independent events, each of them establishing of a separate crime (Art. 50 °, CP), with cumulative penalties. Consume
coverup expected and penalized in Article 404 of the Penal Code. The 2 people have evaded criminal prosecution ordered by the justice, to be specific aggravating the concealment of illicit drug trafficking, which the maximum penalty is 10 years. This is a permanent removal, forever, through artificial means the right of pardon, for these proceedings did not qualify, even for humanitarian reasons.
also committed, in the shameful corruption of officials, known as the illegal trading in influence (Article 400 °, CP), for using his real influence has received a donation of 10,000 dollars for having interceded to effectively criminal before his father, the President of the Republic, in an administrative case, as in the processing of the Prerogative of Mercy. The penalty is not less than 4 nor more than 6.
addition, if we consider the First Lady as a public official, being fraught with public functions, social and representativeness of the country that meets a full view of everyone, including budget management and control of donations cash or in kind, this would be a passive bribery own, and that you accept and receive donations, when it does not matter, as a result have failed to meet their obligations (Art. 393 ° C. P), whose minimum sentence is 5 years and maximum 8.
Ideal is a contest of crime, where at the same time conduct violates several criminal statutes, as narrated, repression is the maximum penalty more severe than expected personal concealment, can be increased, as this behavior broad spectrum, even in a quarter, and not more than 35 years.
3. Question for Dr. Gladys Echaiz .- What do you expect the Prosecutor's Office to proceed as you compete, now that the same criminal protagonist of the scandal has admitted receiving U.S. $ 10.000, of whom she favored?
The timing of the bribes paid no interest. To the judge acquits illegal, it is immaterial that he break his hand before sentencing, the same day, or much later. Same should go inside, for what he did before and outside!
godgod_1@hotmail.com
Lima, March 5, 2011.
0 comments:
Post a Comment